I don’t consider myself to be old, however, my daughters (the older one especially) likes to remind me that I am creeping up there in years. So it’s with that backdrop perhaps that I got a little nostalgic as I was watching the live video of the miners being pulled safely from their underground home of more than two months.
I am old enough to remember the tag line “Film at 11.” Now I don’t remember it in my professional experience–but growing up I can remember Chuck Scarborough on WNBC (Channel 4 in NYC) or the late Bill Beutel on WABC (channel 7 in NYC) saying that line during what I later learned was the :57:30 cut-in. You know it as a tease for the late news that comes during primetime viewing.
For those without the reference–here is a one time ABC News colleague of mine Christina Lund with the familiar tagline (this one delivered on KABC-Los Angeles in 1976)
And that’s what happened. If you wanted to see the story you waited for the news to come on. In talking to some of the long-timers at places I work or have worked, by 1976 the conversion to videotape was well underway-but the myth of film at 11 lived on for years beyond that.
Fast forward to Tuesday night into Wednesday and the miners. Gone was the quaint notion of video. Obsolete the idea of waiting 10 minutes, much less until 11. This (like so many events) played out in real-time in bits and bites transferred in real-time around the world–with instant commentary from Twitter, blogs and news organizations like CBS (where I work) CNN, NBC etc.
And as all of this was going on — generally in that lull when the rescue capsule was being sent back down to the miners and being reloaded and resurfacing — I was able to think about the change I have seen in the news model both as a consumer and a professional.
I did wait for film (or video) at 11. I can remember when a reporter going live was a big deal. I’ve sprinted across snow-covered fields in New Hampshire to a feed point to make slot.
I’ve also pulled out an air-card or MiFi and upload a video file, used QIK to send breaking news video back and updated a story via Twitter using my smart phone camera.
I am not sure I know the “tipping” point in all of this-when the idea of waiting became quaint, but its a good thing. News is a commodity as is information.
While I truly do not think “back in the day” that information was being hoarded and doled out–there was a certain eloquence to it. I also would not have been subjected to Ali Velshi on CNN cramming himself into a model of the rescue capsule.
And that’s not to pick on Mr. Velshi (whom I do not know). It’s the rest of the story. Because we demand to see these things unfold in real-time and unedited, the ability to package and present may be a victim.
Flashback to January of 2010 and the Miracle on the Hudson. Gripping pictures, a story with a happy ending–and miles of instant analysis.
Even when the news is bleakest–9/11 is the moment that leaps to mind the need to “fill the void” was evident. I can even think back to the crash of TWA flight 800 off the coast of Long Island–and the long night I spent on a boat listening to coverage that did not equate with what I was seeing (my Nextel died so I was on my own until the boat came in)–but it’s not all bad, it really is not.
Because all of those sources, all of that information–gives us the power to be the packager. Yes, news organizations need to be the gatekeeper. But I can be my own editor and decide what makes sense.
So turn to Twitter, see what your social network is sharing via Facebook–check the blogs watch the video–its part of the human experience and its the job of my colleagues and me to make sure its there for you with context.